About Us | Contact Us | User Login

  • Home
  • About ForeseeHome
    • Learn More About ForeseeHome
    • Monitoring Process
    • Program Information
    • ForeseeHome FAQs
    • Technology
    • Research
    • Published Research
    • Clinical Trials
      • AREDS2 ForeseeHome Study
      • Wet AMD Monitoring Study
  • Threat of AMD
    • Learn More About the Threat of AMD
    • Dry AMD
    • Wet AMD
    • Importance of Early Detection
    • Inherent Flaws of the Amsler Grid
    • AMD Resources
  • Patient Stories
  • In the News
  • Find a Doctor
    • First Prescriber Sites
    • AREDS2 Study Sites
    • Wet AMD Monitoring Study Sites
CSS Drop Down Menu by PureCSSMenu.com
  • Information for Physicians
    • ForeseeHome Program Information
    • ForeseeHome Physician FAQs
    • Publications
    • Case Studies
    • Physician Testimonials
    • For Current Practices
    • Events
    • Contact Us

TEXT

Home> Information for Physicians > Publications

Publications

Long Term Monitoring of Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Preferential Hyperacuity Perimetry
OSLI 2010: 598-606

Long Term Monitoring of Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Preferential Hyperacuity Perimetry Purpose: To investigate a method that uses hyperacuity, the Macular Computerized Psychophysical Test (MCPT), to evaluate the central macular visual field in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD).


Design: Prospective case-control study of a diagnostic test.

 

Participants and Controls: One hundred eight eyes of 108 Patients with AMD and 51 eyes of 51 agematched patients with no retinal disease. Patients with AMD included 32 (30%) patients with choroidal neovascularization (CNV), 23 (21%) with geographic atrophy (GA), 35 (32%) with AMD with high-risk characteristics (HRC), and 18 (17%) with early AMD with non-HRC.

 

Testing: Each subject underwent the MCPT, in which a virtual line composed of dots (white dots on a black background, maximal contrast) is flashed across different macular loci to a perifoveal radius of 7°. Patients’ responses were recorded and automatically analyzed using a specific algorithm developed before the onset of the study. All patients also underwent a supervised Amsler grid examination on the encounter before or after the MCPT in random order.

 

Main Outcome Measures: Distortion, scotoma, or blurring perceived by the patient after a swift change of
fixation was considered positive on the MCPT. Any perception of distortion, scotoma, or blurring was considered
positive on the Amsler grid.

 

Results: Of the 32 patients with CNV, 30 (94%) were found positive on the MCPT and 11 (34%) were found positive on the Amsler grid. Of the 23 GA patients, 21 (91%) were found positive on the MCPT and 7 (30%) were found positive on the Amsler grid. Of the 35 HRC patients, 28 (80%) were found positive on the MCPT and 3 (9%) were found positive on the Amsler grid, and of the 18 early AMD with non-HRC patients, 8 (44%) were found positive on the MCPT and 3 (17%) were found positive on the Amsler grid. Of the 51 controls, 3 (6%) were positive on the MCPT and 1 (2%) was positive on the Amsler grid.

 

Conclusions: The MCPT was superior to the Amsler grid in detecting AMD-related lesions in this cohort. Studies are underway to determine whether the MCPT is feasible for home monitoring to provide early detection of progression to CNV.

 

Nortal Vision


 

 

© Copyright 2011 Notal VisionTM | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Customer Support Center: (888) 910-2020

Like us on Facebook Subscribe to our YouTube Channel